On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 16:07, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Actually, I take it back. >>> >>> The CHANGELOG on the REL-1_12_PATCHES has some changes for 1.12.1, >>> 1.12.2, 1.12.3. And surprisingly enough also 1.14.0, which certainly >>> didn't exist back then... >> >> Yes - we've done it that way for years. > > I know - and it's been itching me for years ;) > > >>> Which kind of proves my point about the confusion;) >> >> Meh. Someone committed a bad merge. The doesn't mean it hasn't worked >> for the most part. > > So, just to be clear: > > Something that's backpatched goes into both master and the backpatch > CHANGELOG. > > And the order in the CHANGELOG is chronological, *not* > version-ordered? (resulting in mixed versions in head, but consistent > version ordering in backbranches)?
Yes. And for the record - I find it a PITA too; but... it's *much* easier for me than trying to find another few hours for additional tedious release prep tasks. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
