On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > Actually, I don't see us maintaining OGL. We don't have the manpower to > do that. > > I'm wondering if we really need OGL. What do we use it for? because if > it's now out of wxWidgets and if it's an important component for us, we > aren't probably alone. What do the other guys do? Moreover, if they got > rid of it, it's also probably because they don't need it, meaning we > could use something else, available in wxWidgets 2.9 that would replace > OGL. That would be a really better way than maintaining a fork of OGL.
We use it for drawing graphical query plans, and I believe for the query builder. Replacing it would probably not be straightforward. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
