On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 21:19 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: <snip>
> But before working on this, I want to make sure this won't be a > useless effort. So I guess I would like to have a final decision on > this. Do we decide to drop Slony support in 1.14, or do we decide that > I can work on it, fix it, add support for 2.0, etc.? <Talk is cheap for me. All I can do is testing.> ...from a PoV of a user or a DBA from field, we need a real GUI that helps people to setup a Slony-I cluster easily -- or say, as easy as possible. So, if it is not too much effort, I'd say we need to support Slony. Cheers, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
