On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 11:25 +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > PostgreSQL already created a 9.1 branch, so that new features could be >> > commited on head. Actually, there'll be a commitfest starting tomorrow. >> > Should we also create a new branch, so that new features could be >> > applied on head? >> > >> > I have no features right now to commit and push, but it could be >> > interesting nevertheless. >> >> If there's nothing to commit, then all it means it that we'll have to >> start double-patching bugfixes for no gain. >> > > OK, so we open it as soon as we have a commit to push?
Yes. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
