On 07.05.2012 13:54, Dave Page wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On 07.05.2012 13:39, Dave Page wrote:
Can you create a "PRE-9_2" branch for the current architecture, and
apply Ashesh's patch to that if you think it's a reasonable fix
please? We can then move the older builds to that branch. Then the 9.2
changes can go on master.
By current architecture, do you mean what we had in the CVS, or as the code
stands in the current tip of the git repository? I agree we should create a
branch like that, but I want to make sure we agree on where it should be
branched off. I've rearranged and cleaned up the code quite extensively in
git master already, and I'm not sure if we want to include all that in
back-branches. On one hand, I've fixed a lot of bugs with the changes, so it
would be nice to include those fixes, but OTOH, perhaps we shouldn't risk
destabilizing back-branches.
What's at the current tip. I'm happy with those changes in the back
branches - they're really mostly just bug fixes and relatively minor
architectural tweaks as I understood them. It's the move to a single
library that I don't want in the back branches.
Ok. I created branch PRE_9_2, and committed Ashesh's patch there. In
master, I committed a patch to merge pldbgapi.so and plugin_debugger.so.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
