On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:15 -0300, Dickson S. Guedes wrote: >> 2012/6/17 Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info>: >> > Quick question: is trac the right tool? >> >> Which problems we are trying to solve using trac? Are they solved or >> minimized? >> > > Good questions. I use it so that I don't forget a bug to fix, and a > feature request to work on.
I think that's a reasonable and valuable use of it. >> > Maybe trac is not the right tool, and we should use something else? >> >> Maybe are we using it the right way? >> >> I like trac and redmine, the former to projects that are simple, with >> simple workflow, the second to more complex projects, with >> sub-project, ticket dependencies and, IMHO, a better notion of >> "progress" for tickets and milestones. >> >> Which goals we want to achieve? >> > > For me, tracking bugs, and feature requests. If anything we'll move to Redmine eventually, purely because that's what we're using elsewhere in the project by default now. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
