On Saturday, July 14, 2012, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:

> On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 18:57 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, July 14, 2012, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >         On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 11:28 -0300, Vinicius Santos wrote:
> >         >
> >         >         Not sure I like the point either. We don't have that
> >         notation
> >         >         on
> >         >         PostgreSQL. I think I would prefer something like
> >         "Retrieving
> >         >         details on
> >         >         table schema.table" and not say the database.
> >         Because if you
> >         >         add the
> >         >         database, someone will probably want also the
> >         server. It may
> >         >         not be
> >         >         usefull to you, but it'll come at some point. And
> >         that's quite
> >         >         a lot of
> >         >         informations.
> >         >
> >         > I agree.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >         Probably we could add some status boxes in the
> >         status bar. For
> >         >         exemple,
> >         >         a box with a "user@database (server)" (with a lock
> >         icon if you
> >         >         use SSL
> >         >         for example. Just a thought.
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > I liked the idea!
> >         >
> >         > We could add status boxes in front of the information
> >         "Retrieving
> >         > details ...".
> >         >
> >         > For example, suppose that is the status bar:
> >         >
> >         > With 3 status boxes:
> >         >
> >         > || "Retrieving details on schema.table" || user@database ||
> >         server ||
> >         >
> >         > or with 2 status boxes:
> >         >
> >         > || "Retrieving details on schema.table" || user@database
> >         ( server )
> >         > ||
> >         >
> >         >
> >
> >         I think I like the second one better, but this is just my
> >         opinion.
> >
> >
> > Aside from it being a needless amount of information to clutter the
> > display with, I can pretty much guarantee you won't be able to figure
> > out a clean way of sizing the panels to accomodate all that data
> > without truncating one or more of them for some selected objects.
> >
>
> Are we talking about the same thing? I'm not suggesting to add a panel.
> I'm suggesting to add another box in the status bar (wxStatusBar
> object). It won't take any more space than before.
>

The bar won't, but the text in it will.


-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to