On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:52 PM, David E. Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jan 17, 2014, at 10:50 AM, David E. Wheeler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think this is a relatively clean way to go. I'm wondering, though, whether >> the extension will be needed on PostgreSQL servers where pgAgent itself >> isn't installed. Might it be worthwhile to also release an extension that >> just contains the SQL stuff and not pgAgent, so that it can be deployed to >> any server on which one might need to run CREATE EXTENSION pgagent? > > Just nagging here. I didn’t miss a reply, did I? I would like to get any > issues worked out soon so I can rejigger our internal RPM to have CREATE > EXTENSION backported -- unless an updated version of PGAgent is immanent.
No, sorry - looks like I missed your last email. I'll try to look today, but may not be able to as I'm pretty busy. Otherwise it'll probably be next week I'm afraid, due to FOSDEM. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
