Hi On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:54 PM, J.F. Oster <jinfros...@mail.ru> wrote: > Hello, > > Monday, June 16, 2014, 11:58:28 AM, Dave Page wrote: > > DP> Do you have a few minutes to look at this please? > > Sure! > > DP> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Dmitriy Olshevskiy <olshevski...@bk.ru> > wrote: > >>> I applied this patch >>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=010e38cdd4991feaf2e757e803d330dc6c5bdba6 >>> and found that current schema is determined incorrectly when I select such >>> objects as Constraints, Indexes, Rules or Triggers (parts of any Table). >>> In this case combo-box contains item named "Current Schema (<table_name>)" >>> instead of "Current Schema (<schema_name>)". > ... >>> Maybe here must be an additional check for an object's type (in first >>> condition) or there is a bug in the definition of schemas for object tree? > > Dmitry, thanks for testing and reporting! > A surprise for me but really, GetSchema() for collections of indexes, > rules, constraints and triggers returns not <schema_name>, but > <table_name>. Some lines of code like > collection->GetSchema()->GetSchema() > speak well for a design consideration, not a bug.
Oh, yeah - that's a horrible hack that's (unfortunately) deeply baked into the code. Guillaume has spent a lot of time trying to fix that in the past, but it needs a huge amount of work :-( > Dave, please see the attached patch to workaround that. > It also includes minor fixes: > - Extend ORDER BY over 3-rd column (path) > - Dedublicate objects in results grid that have a match in several > search modes simultaneously. Committed - thanks! -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers