On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dave Page <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The part that changed is just the one that added db1 and db2, right? > > It's the server display name *and* the database name, so to give a > (redacted) example from my machine, I would have: > > aws-ap-southeast-1b.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com (aws-ap-southeast-1b. > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com:5432):postgres > > Which as you can see is quite long. > I thought the point of display names was to have them nice and short :) I've certainly never used displaynames that are that long. Yes, I totally see with names like that it becomes annoying, and certainly not easy to parse. Perhaps what we really shoul dhave is just displayname + databasename, and exclude the actual hostname? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
