On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ashesh Vashi <
> ashesh.va...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I was about to reply on this too;
>>>
>>> - Why do we need Marshmallow?
>>>
>>> - Why do we need a role system? Perhaps in the future we might have
>>> shared servers, and roles that cannot modify them, but not now.
>>>
>> Hmm..
>> He just added one more role - 'Standard'.
>> 'Administrator' role was already presents in it.
>>
>
> Oh yes, sorry, misread that. 'pgAdmin User Role' would be a better
> description though I think.
>
Yeah - that can be done. :-)

--

Thanks & Regards,

Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
<http://www.enterprisedb.com/>


*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>

>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Reply via email to