Thanks - committed with a minor change to remove a duplicate WHERE
clause that you added to one of the queries.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> There are a number of cases where queries in both pgadmin4 and pgadmin3 are
> done against pg_depend but falis to constrain the query on classid.
>
> In particular, if for example a constraint and a sequence exists with the
> same oid (which is perfectly valid, as they are in different tables), a
> column will suddenly refer sequences that are completely incorrect. When we
> look up sequences, we have to make sure we only match dependencies against
> pg_class.
>
> AFAICT, the following patch catches the important ones. I could go ahead and
> push it, but given that we're in RC I'd appreciate a round of review before
> doing that, even though it looks fairly simple.
>
> I've got the same changes in a patch to pgadmin3, as these queries are
> basically a copy/paste from there. But let's focus the review on the one for
> pgadmin4 :)
>
> --
>  Magnus Hagander
>  Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>  Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>



-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers

Reply via email to