Thanks!

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017, 6:26 AM Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:

> Thanks - patch applied with minor tweaks to make it fail much earlier
> if framework.conf isn't present, and to update to current versions of
> Python/Qt.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Atira Odhner <aodh...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > Sure, sounds good. We accidentally had a stray chmod hanging out, which
> we
> > removed. We also made it exit if the framework.conf is missing. We opted
> in
> > that direction over the auto-using framework.conf.in because we feel
> like it
> > is likely that developers will need to set these values to get the build
> to
> > work, so failing will make it more obvious where versions need to be set
> to
> > line up with their systems.
> > Here is an updated patch.
> >
> > Tira, Sarah & George
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:41 PM, George Gelashvili
> >> <ggelashv...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >> > Hello Hackers!
> >> >
> >> > We were building the QT app locally with QTDIR, PGDIR, PYTHON_HOME,
> and
> >> > PYTHON_VERSION set, and by running:
> >> > make appbundle
> >> >
> >> > We were seeing the runtime error:
> >> >>
> >> >> Could not find QtWebEngineProcess
> >> >> Abort trap: 6
> >> >
> >> > after a successful python server start.
> >> >
> >> > We found that the setup before signing in codesign-bundle.sh was
> >> > necessary
> >> > to resolve this, whether or not one is planning on signing the app or
> >> > dmg.
> >> > The fix requires setting variables appropriately in
> >> > mac/pkg/framework.conf
> >> >
> >> > We've attached a patch with our changes.
> >>
> >> I'm seeing the following in the output:
> >>
> >> App completed: /Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/pkg/mac/../../mac-build/pgAdmin
> >> 4.app
> >> usage: chmod [-fhv] [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-a | +a | =a  [i][# [ n]]]
> >> mode|entry file ...
> >> chmod [-fhv] [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-E | -C | -N | -i | -I] file ...
> >> Reorganising the framework structure
> >>
> >> I wonder if there's any point in building if framework.conf isn't
> >> present? It clearly doesn't work, so we should probably just exit if
> >> it's not there (or attempt to run using the default values in
> >> framework.conf.in.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave Page
> >> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> >> Twitter: @pgsnake
> >>
> >> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
> >> To make changes to your subscription:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Reply via email to