That is strange. I tested on PG9.6 and it was working properly, What is the your PG version?
-- Regards, Murtuza Zabuawala EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@ > enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >>> >>> PFA minor patch to fix the the issue with bigint[] array values as JS >>> truncates long numbers from array object. >>> RM#2272 >>> >> > Hi > > As far as I can see, this doesn't work as expected. The "bad" column is > interpreted as numeric[] on my machine, which I assume needs to be added to > the list as well? > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
