I agree with Brendan: no matter how rude a mail to the list could be, yo cannot answer the same mood.

But my main concern is the unsuscribe mechanism: it does not work; I tried it some days ago, and the mails continue arriving.

Marcelo

On 23/06/17 16:40, Brendan Neff wrote:
I was letting this stuff go as best as I could, but this is some serious nonsense going on right here. And the response by Paragon and devs or whatever they are is horrible. If a fool is rude to you, you don't, as the face of a company, respond in a rude way. You shouldn't have access to public facing communications if that's how you're going to respond.

As for the unsubscribe stuff, it doesn't work. I'm reporting spam and blocking senders, and will report every other email I get from the group as spam as well. Don't like that? Fix it on your end.

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 2:32 PM Alex Ignatov <a.igna...@postgrespro.ru <mailto:a.igna...@postgrespro.ru>> wrote:

    What  PgAdmin is and why everybody is unsubscribing?

    Alexey Ignatov



    On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:19 PM +0300, "Russell Mercer"
    <rmer...@getspatial.com <mailto:rmer...@getspatial.com>> wrote:

        Melvin,

        PgAdmin 4 has more in depth support for foreign data tables
        and materialized views than does PgAdmin III.  There are
        separate sections for them which makes sense as they are a
        different construct than a standard view or table.  These are
        the primary items I was referring to.

        Russell


        On 2017-06-23 11:54, Melvin Davidson wrote:

        *Russell,*
        *>I still use PG Admin 4 because it supports features in the
        new versions of Postgres that *
        *> version 3 simply doesn't.*
        **
        *Just curious. What features does PgAdmin 4 have that PgAdmin
        III does not?
        *
        *I did a survey involving a future feature that is planned,
        but I have not yet *
        *seen that as of 4 v1.5 .
        *
        Melvin Davidson 🎸
        I reserve the right to fantasize.  Whether or not you
        wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.
        www.youtube.com/unusedhero/videos
        <http://www.youtube.com/unusedhero/videos>
        Folk Alley - All Folk - 24 Hours a day
        www.folkalley.com <http://www.folkalley.com>

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        On Friday, June 23, 2017, 2:47:51 PM EDT, Paragon Corporation
        <l...@pcorp.us <mailto:l...@pcorp.us>> wrote:

        Russell,

        I fail to see a "valid" criticism in the original email. If
        there anything constructive at all, I would not have deemed
        him/her a fool.

        Respectfully,

        Leo

        *From:*Russell Mercer [mailto:rmer...@getspatial.com
        <mailto:rmer...@getspatial.com>]
        *Sent:* Friday, June 23, 2017 2:04 PM
        *To:* Paragon Corporation <l...@pcorp.us <mailto:l...@pcorp.us>>
        *Cc:* 'Pgadmin Support' <pgadmin-supp...@postgresql.org
        <mailto:pgadmin-supp...@postgresql.org>>
        *Subject:* Re: Extreme incompetence by pgAdmin people in
        every way imaginable...

        It is my hope that this response does not indicate what I
        think it might, which is that the valid criticisms he has
        made in his emails are being lost in the immaturity with
        which he has presented them.

        The points are valid that PG Admin 4 is extremely slow on
        Windows machines.  It is also true that there is a feature
        gap between this new version of the software, and PG Admin
        3.  It is extremely surprising that this gap exists given the
        stated $1,000,000+ expenditure for development of the new
        version. Where PG Admin 3 was able to spread across multiple
        windows on multiple monitors, PG Admin 4 is constrained to
        essentially a browser window.

        With the issues it has, I still use PG Admin 4 because it
        supports features in the new versions of Postgres that
        version 3 simply doesn't.  I know the developers have been
        active on the mailing list and are attempting to suss out
        some of the thornier performance issues on Windows. For these
        reasons, I have made my concerns known a couple of times, but
        will not continue to harp on them.

        I realize that in the end, I get what I pay for.  If you
        choose to cast people as fools who have criticisms of your
        software, that is your choice.  I am a user of the database,
        and the admin software.  I am not a software developer, so my
        avenues for action to solve the problem are limited.  I am
        left with the option to air my concerns, as are many other
        people.  Hopefully we are not written off simply because this
        is all we do, however poorly we may choose to present them.

        The story of the court jesters of old comes to mind.  They
        were written off as fools by the majority of people, however
        they used that as cover to deliver what was in many cases,
        extremely pointed social commentary.  So, while the original
        poster may be considered a fool, it does not make him wrong.

        Thank you for the time and effort put forth on both
        PostgreSQL and PGAdmin.  They are great tools!

        Russell

        On 2017-06-23 07:07, Paragon Corporation wrote:

            "Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain. And most
            fools do."

            --- Benjamin Franklin

            *From:*grekloe...@tutanota.com
            <mailto:grekloe...@tutanota.com>
            [mailto:grekloe...@tutanota.com]
            *Sent:* Friday, June 23, 2017 9:16 AM
            *To:* Pgadmin Support <pgadmin-supp...@postgresql.org
            <mailto:pgadmin-supp...@postgresql.org>>
            *Subject:* Extreme incompetence by pgAdmin people in
            every way imaginable...

            This isn't even funny. It's just sad and bizarre.
            Everything about this project screams of incompetence,
            from the impossibly slow and buggy pgAdmin 4 -- literally
            UNUSABLE after over a million dollars spent developing
            it! -- to this mailing list itself.

            I'm going to have to assume that nobody gives a shit
            about anything related to pgAdmin. I'm sure as hell never
            going to "upgrade" from pgAdmin III, which itself is
            incredibly slow and buggy as well, but lightyears ahead
            of v4.

            Then again, nobody will read this, just like my previous
            posts. You are immune to the truth. I'm going to force
            myself to use one of the weird "alternatives" and forget
            about pgAdmin forever. Bye.

            (If I manage to unsubscribe to this inferno.)


Reply via email to