> On 13 Oct 2017, at 05:16, Stephen Cook <scli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2017-10-12 15:59, Michael Rasmussen wrote: >> I would suggest keep trying pgAdmin 4 and reporting on issues, so >> progress towards making it the tool we want it to be. > > It won't happen, choices have been made that preclude it from ever being > a fast, lightweight native app. "Stable", "Fast", and "Features" have > been redefined; this project does not have the same goals as the > previous one.
Correct. pgAdmin 4 is now provably significantly faster than pgAdmin 3 where it counts the most (query tool), and has far few known issues - not one universally repeatable crash bug that we know of, compared to various unfixable ones in pgAdmin 3.
