Hi, On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:57 AM Akshay Joshi <akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Brandon > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:22 PM Hibbard, Brandon < > brandon.hibb...@zimmerbiomet.com> wrote: > >> Hello Akshay and pgAdmin support, >> >> >> >> I am on version 3.4 now, and the auto complete is listing the tables in >> the schema, but it is not listing the fields in the table. Is this still >> an open bug? >> > > Are you talking about listing the fields in the table for auto > complete? If yes then It's working for me. To see the fields in the table > using auto complete you will have to create an alias for the table name. > Please see the attached screenshots. > >> >> >> I have also noticed an odd formatting behavior when there are nested >> functions. An example is Upper(trim(b.source)). At the end of this line, >> if you enter down, the auto indent is way off and continues to be for the >> following lines. If you add a space between the last two parenthesis like >> Upper(trim(b.source) ), the auto indent works as expected. >> > > For this please create a new RM > We have a RM raised for this problem - https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3583. It will be fixed when CodeMirror's next version is available as it is fixed there. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brandon >> >> >> >> *From:* Akshay Joshi <akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> >> *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2018 12:05 PM >> *To:* Hibbard, Brandon <brandon.hibb...@zimmerbiomet.com> >> *Cc:* pgAdmin Support <pgadmin-supp...@postgresql.org> >> *Subject:* Re: v3.3 Auto complete broken >> >> >> >> Hi Brandon >> >> >> >> RM 3630 has already been there and I have sent the patch on pgadmin >> hackers where objects belongs to schema other than pg_catalog and public >> are not listed. You can apply that patch and test it. >> >> >> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, 21:26 Hibbard, Brandon, < >> brandon.hibb...@zimmerbiomet.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I installed pgAdmin 4 v3.3 today and autocomplete isn’t working >> correctly. It does not list the tables in a schema or the fields in the >> table. Is this a bug or have I done something wrong? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Brandon >> >> > > -- > *Akshay Joshi* > > *Sr. Software Architect * > > > > *Phone: +91 20-3058-9517Mobile: +91 976-788-8246* > -- Thanks and Regards, Aditya Toshniwal Software Engineer | EnterpriseDB Software Solutions | Pune "Don't Complain about Heat, Plant a tree"
