Re: [pgadmin-support] Strange bug...

[Donald Fraser]

Title: Message

Thanks for that Dave, I don't mind it not displaying the constraint as an index but the one thing I would ask for is consistency...   For example if I create the following table via SQL:   CREATE TABLE public.tbl_cmpycat ( id int4 NOT NULL, s_desc text NOT NULL, id_editedby int4, dt_edited timestamp, CONSTRAINT tbl_cmpycat_desc_key UNIQUE (s_desc), CONSTRAINT tbl_cmpycat_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id) ) WITHOUT OIDS;   When I view it under pgAdminII it lists one index named tbl_cmpycat_desc_key...?   This then leads on to another bug... When I try to drop the above table (not the index) pgAdminII attempts to drop the index first and then I get the following message as recorded in the log. 21-01-2003 12:52:17 - SQL (Bugs): DROP INDEX public.tbl_cmpycat_desc_key 21-01-2003 12:52:17 - Error in pgAdmin II:basActions.Drop: -2147467259 - ERROR:  Cannot drop index tbl_cmpycat_desc_key because constraint tbl_cmpycat_desc_key on table tbl_cmpycat requires it  You may drop constraint tbl_cmpycat_desc_key on table tbl_cmpycat instead   Regards Donald Fraser   ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Page To: Donald Fraser ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:28 PM Subject: RE: [pgadmin-support] Strange bug... Hi Donald,   This is a feature, not a bug :-)   Seriously, pgAdmin figures out that the index is part of a constraint and classes it as a system object, therefore hiding it. If you switch on View System Objects on the View menu, you will see both indexes under the table. My guess is that pg_dump is not quite so clever and misses the UNIQUE constraint from the table definition, adding the index manually instead.   Regards, Dave. -----Original Message----- From: Donald Fraser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 20:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgadmin-support] Strange bug... OS W2K SP2 pgAdmin II 1.4.12 PostgreSQL 7.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96   Another strange bug...   I create the following table using an SQL statement:   CREATE TABLE "tbl_usertype" ( "id" int4 NOT NULL, "s_desc" varchar(60) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT "tbl_usertype_s_desc_key" UNIQUE ("s_desc"), CONSTRAINT "tbl_usertype_pkey" PRIMARY KEY ("id") ) WITHOUT OIDS; GRANT SELECT ON "tbl_usertype" TO PUBLIC;   pgAdmin then reports the following as the SQL statements:   -- Table: public.tbl_usertype CREATE TABLE public.tbl_usertype ( id int4 NOT NULL, s_desc varchar(60) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT tbl_usertype_s_desc_key UNIQUE (s_desc), CONSTRAINT tbl_usertype_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id) ) WITHOUT OIDS; GRANT SELECT ON TABLE public.tbl_usertype TO PUBLIC; GRANT ALL ON TABLE public.tbl_usertype TO postgres;   Now one would expect to see under pgAdmin one Index named "tbl_usertype_s_desc_key". pgAdmin reports zero Indexes....? Again I checked the output from pg_dumpall and it definitely exists. pg_dump displays the following lines. -- Name: tbl_usertype_s_desc_key; Type: INDEX; Schema: public; Owner: postgres CREATE UNIQUE INDEX tbl_usertype_s_desc_key ON tbl_usertype USING btree (s_desc);   Regards Donald Fraser.