Hi,

i just found some wxWidget 2.6 rpms for FC4.x86_64 at http://stentz.freshrpms.net/

after installing the wx packages, i edited the pgadmin-1.4.0 spec file to build a dymanically linked rpm by removing " --enable-static " from " %configure --enable-static --disable-debug".

anyone interested in the rpm can mail me.

i just tested for a few minutes, but so far everything seems to work.

cheers

max

Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

Hi,

Sorry for the ultra late response :(

On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Max Giesbert wrote:

pgAdmin3.cpp:23:25: error: wx/stdpaths.h: No such file or directory
the stdpaths.h isn't anywhere on the harddisk.


You have to install wx from source, AFAICS. Look at the link below for details. AFAIK, no FC4 RPM includes this file...

is it possible that the src.rpm needs wxGTK >=2.6?
if so, why doesn't the dependency not fial?


Because the spec file does not look for an RPM installation of wx. When we wrote this spec file, binary installation of wx was full of pain -- That's why I try to build RPMs for many platforms on my development server.

If you want to rebuild RPM, then you should follow the instructions

http://www.pgadmin.org/download.php#source

while building wxwidgets. Then rebuilding FC4 RPM is easy.

also has anyone got wxGTK-2.6 rpms for x86_64?


Last month I intended to fix wx's spec file; however I gave up before going crazy. But maybe I "have to" do it at least for for pgAdmin3... Let me give another try for it this weekend (This weekend is my "RPM Building Festival")

Regards,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
                      http://www.gunduz.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to