Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (...)
>> I've implemented that change as suggested. The existing code went out of
>> it's way to behave as it did (using setval|('my_seq', 111, FALSE); on <
>> 7.4 in fact!) so it was obviously a conscious design choice, but it's
>> not one I can see any justification for!
>>
>> Cheers, Dave.
>
> Nice!
> Additionally displaying the sequence's is_called flag in the properties
> is not an easy option, I assume?
It's not a problem, it's just one of those things that inevitably leads
to confusion amongst some users.
> Congratulations on the newly released v 1.6.3, btw! Seems to be the best
> pgAdmin I have seen so far. :)
Thanks - thats usually the case with the back branches as we iron out
all the bugs. We'll have a new release soon, with a whole new set of
bugs for you to find :-p
/D
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
