Dave Page a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Zach Conrad a écrit :
Thank you for your quick response.
There are a few things this brings up:
1. The pgAdmin help file states the use of datname IN ('blah') in the DB
Restriction field
2. Most people know which databases they want to connect to. Wouldn't it
make
more sense to use datename IN (...) rather than NOT IN?
OK, it seems my bugfix was wrong. And I suppose the one on schema
restriction is also wrong.
My patch is more user friendly (you don't have to know the name of
pg_database's columns), but it allows less stuff (you can just give
databases' names, you won't be able to filter on columns other than
datname). It seems a regression to me, sorry about this.
Dave, what do you think I should do ? remove the patch ?
Just remove the NOT?
I can do this. But, for example, if someone was using this filter field
to get out template databases, removing the NOT won't fix this.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
