On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:14, Dave Page<dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Guillaume Lelarge<guilla...@lelarge.info> > wrote: >> >> We are not yet compatible with 2.9.0. I began the work on that, but I'm >> afraid >> this will be a hard work. > > That's what I was afraid of. I've heard they've done some pretty major > redesign (hence the planned move from 2.x.x to 3.x.x). > > If we do move, I suspect we'll end up chasing new wxWidgets bugs for > months to come as well. I was toying with the idea of keeping our own > set of wxWidgets patchs, as there's also a nasty issue with the STC > that Ashesh and Hiroshi have started looking into, but that doesn't > help on platforms like Ubuntu and Fedora where users will be using the > stock wxWidgets packages- and I whilst I could live with rolling our > own custom wxWidgets tarball, I certainly don't want to do RPMs and > DEBs etc.
If we have our own, couldn't we just link statically? That said, I bet they have *other* patches in that are specific to their distribution - they often do. And having to somehow end up having to merge these things back and forth doesn't sound particularly entertaining. -- Magnus Hagander Self: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
