>> Nor I won't do it on any other Windows machine. > > With respect, if you won't do it, why should I? Hehe, I don't know. Maybe because you like working on Windows? Of course, you don't have to. :-)
>> By the way, this is no bug? You intended to change it this way? > > No it's not a bug. It's a consequence of us using VC++ 2008 instead of > 2005. Next year it'll probably be built with 2010. I suspect you have > some other software on your servers that already had the 2005 runtimes > installed, which is why pgAdmin worked as it did. On a clean > installation of Windows it wouldn't work like that. Oh I see. So that's why it worked and now it doesn't. I understand. Thank you for this information. >>> Aside from you there hasn't been any requests for them. >> Would it be that difficult for you? I and my team would be very thankful. > > It probably would be tricky to automate as we need to figure out where > to get the runtimes from. Different versions get installed > side-by-side in different directories, and I'm not sure how you are > supposed to figure that out (you don't need to to just use them). > Doing it manually would be time consuming, and I'm afraid I already > spend 12+ hours a day working most of the time, and really don't want > to add to that. > > Maybe someone else can help? Thank you for that explanation. I think I just tell those IT guys to update that VC++ stuff but I'm sure they won't do it. Maybe I just try some other GUIs. Thanks anyway. :-) -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
