On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 09:58 +0000, Dave Page wrote: > Hi Guillaume > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit : > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > >> <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > >>> We had 1.2 support. To have 2.0, we would have to get rid of the > >>> sl_trigger checks. Or was it dropped along the way of 2.0? > >> > >> No idea - I just recall Sachin working on compatibility, and that was > >> one of/the patch he came of with. > >> > > > > Yeah, you're right. I now see the commit. Which means we have two bugs > > on 2.0 support. > > What happened with this in the end? I've just run into the pg_listener > bug again. I see from the thread you said you were going to work on > it, but then we got side-tracked into a discussion on whether we > should have slony support at all. >
I still have it on my todo list. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
