Thanks Dinesh, Guillaume. I've committed these changes locally and will
push as soon as I have an internet connection again.

On Sunday, May 19, 2013, Dinesh Kumar wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> Thank you very much for fixing these issue, and i have re-viewed and done
> the test cases with this patch and seems now the browser is more stable.
>
>
> Dinesh
>
> --
> *Dinesh Kumar*
> Software Engineer
>
> Ph: +918087463317
>  Skype ID: dinesh.kumar432
> www.enterprisedb.co 
> <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>m<http://www.enterprisedb.com/>
> *
> Follow us on Twitter*
> @EnterpriseDB
>
> Visit EnterpriseDB for tutorials, webinars, 
> whitepapers<http://www.enterprisedb.com/resources-community> and
> more <http://www.enterprisedb.com/resources-community>
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Guillaume Lelarge 
> <guilla...@lelarge.info<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'guilla...@lelarge.info');>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 20:20 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> > [CCing to -support as people there have been waiting for some of these
>> fixes]
>> >
>> > The attached patch (against master) cleans up a number of issues in
>> > the browser code:
>> >
>> > - It fixes the collapsing tree issue by reverting patch 1 which
>> > attempted to fix a bug caused by patch 2. The bug in patch 2 has been
>> > fixed by partially reverting some code that attempted (badly) to
>> > re-display objects in the treeview after they had been moved to
>> > another schema.
>> >
>> > - Removes the few "Apply" buttons we had, and all the supporting code
>> > for consistency with other dialogues and to dissuade users from
>> > editing function code etc. in the dialogues (as we already try to do
>> > with a Guru Hint).
>> >
>> > - The removal of the "Apply" buttons means that patch 3 is no longer
>> > required, and has been reverted to simplify the code.
>> >
>> > - The removal of the "Apply" buttons also obsoletes another bug that
>> > caused a crash if renaming an object and then using the Apply button.
>> > Dinesh had been working on a patch for this issue which was > 20KB and
>> > made the browser code even more complex than it is now.
>> >
>> > Patch 1:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=e97d351dcbc42a38f0054a81f37727d511087ffa
>> >
>> > Patch 2:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=3e05c4d832e5658419094c34ce0ee6959bc1d85a
>> >
>> > Patch 3:
>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commit;h=cb5dba55dc491107e4152bd80ec496294e449934
>> >
>> > Comments please? I'm planning on applying to master and REL-1_16.
>> >
>>
>> I'm fine with reverting the 3 previous patches, and applying this one.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume
>> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
>> http://www.dalibo.com
>>
>>
>

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Reply via email to