Sure Dave,

I will try and let you know.

Regards,
Sanket Mehta
Sr Software engineer
Enterprisedb

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:

> Sanket, can you reproduce this?
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> > On 07/10/2015 07:16 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> >> Are you able to get a stacktrace from a running instance that's hung?
> >
> > Yes, but it's not doing anything, it's just polling for the next job.
> >
> >> Also, does setting the logging level to debug reveal anything useful
> >> in the filesystem logs? (pgagent -l2 ....)
> >
> > Nope.  And I scanned the postgresql log for SQL errors, and there's
> nothing.
> >
> > What appears to be happening is:
> >
> > 1. pgagent picks up job
> >
> > 2. pgagent finds first step in that job
> >
> > 3. pgagent executes first step (successfully, according to the
> > postgresql log, and according to a fake "touch file" job I added).
> >
> > 4. pgagent abandons the job without updating the status of either the
> > job or the step.
> >
> > 5. pgagent starts polling for new jobs.
> >
> > 6. Repeat 1-5 until all jobs are in "r" state with an assigned agent,
> > but not running.
> >
> > Note that this particular user has now abandoned pgagent and is
> > switching to centrally managed cron, so my ability to get further
> > troubleshooting information will be limited.
> >
> > According to apt-get, this is the latest pgagent package.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Berkus
> > PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> > http://pgexperts.com
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

Reply via email to