On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Mike Surcouf <mi...@surcouf.co.uk> wrote: > Static resources will be good for caching :-) I would expect to see > performance gains when using remotely via a browser. Thankyou. > I'm not sure whether QtWeb will benefit as much as its local traffic so round > trips should be pretty instantaneous. > Unless QtWeb is horribly inefficient in which case I hope it helps.
Right - and on Windows, I think that is actually the problem which is why users have reported that running the server separately and using a regular browser makes a big difference. FYI, when I was testing on Windows over the weekend, in my test VM, simply changing "localhost" as the connection target in the runtime to "127.0.0.1" took the startup time from ~34 seconds to ~24. I lost count of how many times I tested that, but it was pretty consistent. That hints to me that the network side is what is less performant - obviously the resolver, but I suspect also connection setup which is why I have high hopes for web packing. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
