Acredito que o amigo sugeriu o analyze por ser um procedimento padrão após
restore, conforme menciona a documentação:

"After restoring a backup, it is wise to run ANALYZE
<http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/sql-analyze.html> on each
database so the query optimizer has useful statistics"
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/backup-dump.html#BACKUP-DUMP-RESTORE

De qualquer forma, você pode verificar as estatísticas das tabelas pela
view pg_stat_user_tables (ou por sua: variante: pg_stat_all_tables).

Abraço!



2016-04-04 17:47 GMT-03:00 Márcio A. Sepp <[email protected]>:

> > Bom dia,
> >
> >
> > Atualizei um servidor que estava utilizando a versão 9.0 para a 9.4.7
> > e após atualização esta query passou a ficar extremamente lenta.
> >
> > SQL:
> > select movto_lote.nr_dcto
> > from fin_receber_parc parc
> > inner join fin_receber receber on (receber.cd_movto = parc.cd_movto_rec
> and
> >                                    receber.cd_serie_lcto =
> > parc.cd_serie_lcto)
> > inner join fin_receber_cnt cnt on (cnt.cd_movto_rec= receber.cd_movto and
> >
> > cnt.cd_serie_lcto=receber.cd_serie_lcto)
> > inner join cnt_movto movto on (cnt.cd_movto=movto.cd_movto and
> >                                movto.cd_serie_lcto=cnt.cd_serie_lcto)
> > inner join cnt_movto_lote movto_lote on (movto_lote.cd_movto =
> > movto.cd_movto_lote and
> >                                          movto_lote.cd_serie_lcto =
> > movto.cd_serie_lcto)
> > inner join cnt_competencia competencia on (competencia.cd_competencia
> > =
> > movto_lote.cd_competencia)
> > inner join uni_emitente emitente on (emitente.cd_emitente =
> > receber.cd_devedor)
> > inner join fin_especie especie on (especie.cd_especie =
> > parc.cd_especie ) where upper(coalesce(movto_lote.ds_historico, '%'))
> like upper('%%') and
> >       upper(coalesce(movto_lote.nr_dcto, '%')) like upper('%%') and
> >       upper(coalesce(competencia.nm_competencia, '%')) like upper('%%')
> and
> >       upper(coalesce(emitente.nm_emitentecompleto, '%')) like
> > upper('%consumidor%') and
> >       coalesce(parc.vl_valor, 0) between coalesce(0, 0) and
> > coalesce(999999.99, 999999999) and
> >       coalesce(receber.cd_devedor, 0) between coalesce(0, 0) and
> > coalesce(999999999, 999999999) and
> >       movto_lote.dt_movto between ('01/01/2000') and ('01/03/9999') and
> >       parc.dt_vcto between ('01/01/2000') and ('31/12/9999') and
> >       parc.st_quitado = false and
> >       movto_lote.cd_estabelecimento=1
> > order by parc.dt_vcto desc
> >
> >
> > Saída do Explain Analyze:
> > "Sort  (cost=4779.91..4779.91 rows=1 width=16) (actual
> > time=128286.342..128286.342 rows=6 loops=1)"
> > "  Sort Key: parc.dt_vcto DESC"
> > "  Sort Method: quicksort  Memory: 25kB"
> > "  ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.96..4779.90 rows=1 width=16) (actual
> > time=126064.707..128286.279 rows=6 loops=1)"
> > "        Join Filter: (parc.cd_especie = especie.cd_especie)"
> > "        Rows Removed by Join Filter: 36"
> > "        ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.96..4778.74 rows=1 width=18) (actual
> > time=126064.672..128286.198 rows=6 loops=1)"
> > "              ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.68..4777.55 rows=1 width=22)
> (actual
> > time=64031.477..128247.981 rows=3189 loops=1)"
> > "                    Join Filter: (movto_lote.cd_competencia =
> > competencia.cd_competencia)"
> > "                    Rows Removed by Join Filter: 15945"
> > "                    ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.68..4776.37 rows=1
> width=26)
> > (actual time=64031.432..128164.285 rows=3189 loops=1)"
> > "                          Join Filter: (receber.cd_serie_lcto =
> > movto_lote.cd_serie_lcto)"
> > "                          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=1.26..4775.86 rows=1
> > width=26) (actual time=0.085..128005.877 rows=6277 loops=1)"
> > "                                Join Filter: (receber.cd_serie_lcto =
> > movto.cd_serie_lcto)"
> > "                                ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.83..4774.95
> rows=1
> > width=24) (actual time=0.078..127775.182 rows=6277 loops=1)"
> > "                                      ->  Nested Loop
> (cost=0.42..3012.16
> > rows=1 width=30) (actual time=0.067..214.384 rows=6318 loops=1)"
> > "                                            ->  Seq Scan on
> > fin_receber_parc parc  (cost=0.00..2745.68 rows=32 width=16) (actual
> > time=0.052..91.802 rows=6318 loops=1)"
> > "                                                  Filter: ((NOT
> st_quitado)
> > AND (COALESCE(vl_valor, '0'::numeric) >= '0'::numeric) AND
> > (COALESCE(vl_valor, '0'::numeric) <= 999999.99) AND (dt_vcto >=
> > '2000-01-01'::date) AND (dt_vcto <= '9999-12-31'::date))"
> > "                                                  Rows Removed by
> Filter:
> > 81216"
> > "                                            ->  Index Scan using
> > "pk-fin_receber-geral" on fin_receber receber  (cost=0.42..8.32 rows=1
> > width=14) (actual time=0.013..0.014 rows=1 loops=6318)"
> > "                                                  Index Cond:
> ((cd_movto =
> > parc.cd_movto_rec) AND (cd_serie_lcto = parc.cd_serie_lcto))"
> > "                                                  Filter:
> > ((COALESCE(cd_devedor, 0) >= 0) AND (COALESCE(cd_devedor, 0) <=
> 999999999))"
> > "                                      ->  Index Scan using
> > "pk-fin_receber_cnt-cd_movto-cd_serie_lcto" on fin_receber_cnt cnt
> > (cost=0.42..1762.78 rows=1 width=18) (actual time=7.918..20.187 rows=1
> > loops=6318)"
> > "                                            Index Cond: (cd_serie_lcto =
> > receber.cd_serie_lcto)"
> > "                                            Filter: (receber.cd_movto =
> > cd_movto_rec)"
> > "                                            Rows Removed by Filter:
> 87707"
> > "                                ->  Index Scan using
> > "pk-cnt_movto-cd_movto-cd_serie_lcto" on cnt_movto movto
> > (cost=0.42..0.90
> > rows=1 width=18) (actual time=0.031..0.031 rows=1 loops=6277)"
> > "                                      Index Cond: ((cd_movto =
> > cnt.cd_movto) AND (cd_serie_lcto = cnt.cd_serie_lcto))"
> > "                          ->  Index Scan using
> "pk-cnt_movto_lote-geral" on
> > cnt_movto_lote movto_lote  (cost=0.42..0.50 rows=1 width=26) (actual
> > time=0.022..0.023 rows=1 loops=6277)"
> > "                                Index Cond: ((cd_movto =
> > movto.cd_movto_lote) AND (cd_serie_lcto = movto.cd_serie_lcto))"
> > "                                Filter: ((dt_movto >= '2000-01-01
> > 00:00:00-02'::timestamp with time zone) AND (dt_movto <= '9999-03-01
> > 00:00:00-03'::timestamp with time zone) AND (cd_estabelecimento = 1)
> > AND (upper((COALESCE(ds_historico, '%'::character va (...)"
> > "                                Rows Removed by Filter: 0"
> > "                    ->  Seq Scan on cnt_competencia competencia
> > (cost=0.00..1.11 rows=6 width=4) (actual time=0.006..0.012 rows=6
> > loops=3189)"
> > "                          Filter: (upper((COALESCE(nm_competencia,
> > '%'::bpchar))::text) ~~ '%%'::text)"
> > "              ->  Index Scan using "pk-uni_emitente-cd_emitente" on
> > uni_emitente emitente  (cost=0.28..1.18 rows=1 width=4) (actual
> > time=0.010..0.010 rows=0 loops=3189)"
> > "                    Index Cond: (cd_emitente = receber.cd_devedor)"
> > "                    Filter: (upper((COALESCE(nm_emitentecompleto,
> > '%'::character varying))::text) ~~ '%CONSUMIDOR%'::text)"
> > "                    Rows Removed by Filter: 1"
> > "        ->  Seq Scan on fin_especie especie  (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=7
> > width=4) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=7 loops=6)"
> > "Planning time: 22.367 ms"
> > "Execution time: 128286.670 ms"
> >
> >
> > Pelo que estou entendendo o problema está no fin_receber_cnt. Mas não
> > to achando o furo.
> > Observem que na versão 9.0 estava funcionando de forma satisfatoria.
> >
>
>
> Atualize as estatísticas com o comando ANALYZE.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/interactive/sql-analyze.html
>
>
> Por favor, me explique como vc chegou a esta conclusão? diz algo aí que as
> estatísticas estão desatualizadas? (eu não manjo muito da saída do analyze
> e to me batendo nisso a horas).
> Mas eu havia feito todas as manutenções antes de enviar a saída do analyze
> e inclusive peguei o banco e subi numa máquina minha e continua na mesma
> lentidão.
>
> Talvez precise que eu envie mais alguma informação pra ajudar?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pgbr-geral mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listas.postgresql.org.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pgbr-geral
>
_______________________________________________
pgbr-geral mailing list
[email protected]
https://listas.postgresql.org.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pgbr-geral

Responder a