> > Look at the project cybercluster, they claim they have fixed these > bugs. > > And is open source too meanwhile. > > But, if its essentially pgCluster + support (which is what it looks > like from their web site), even if it will work on 64bit, won't it > suffer from the same performance / design issues that Devrim eluded to?
I spent months with these tools (install, test, stress-test). It was working, the selects were balanced very well (our application does not have many writes, so it scaled very well) We had major problems during the recover. It crashed time-to-time, so unfortunately we were not able to use it in production environment. We found more bugs and reported to Cybertech, and asked for support of the product, but they said, they don't suggest cybercluster or pgcluster, even they have a programmer who worked a lot on it. What I really don't see, why is it still on their site as a living and supported product:( So they confused us as well you. One of a bugs in the balancing code: we have a table which contains a field "created", and it was replicated because it matches the "create" pattern. Mitani: you could look at it or I can send a patch for it. Regards, Gergo _______________________________________________ Pgcluster-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgcluster-general
