On 2014-04-05, 21:40, Christian Feuersaenger wrote: > as already mentioned, your old mails from January have slipped my > discipline... I am sorry for not answering right away.
No problem! Thanks for your answers. I'm also sorry for answering so late, I just didn't check the newsgroup for a long time ... Actually, in the mean time, I regarded the fact that what I wanted to achieve is not possible without hassle as an indicator that what I want might be not advisable. I decided to split the complicated charts into several simpler charts, and I think the data are now represented more clearly. With the simpler charts it was also no longer necessary to have a line above the bars to indicate to which bars the significance stars belong. The simpler charts have only two bars (disease and control), and I could thus simply put the stars over the disease bar. What I still think to be desirable would be a method to put a label over a bar (e.g. a significance star) with automatic calculation of the necessary y limits enlargement to make space for it. Again, thanks for your support! Kind regards, Joshua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech _______________________________________________ Pgfplots-features mailing list Pgfplots-features@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgfplots-features
