No objections here. Actually, I don't see advantages of pgpool over pgpool-II, so I think it's better to put effort on pgpool-II.
Daniel -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tatsuo Ishii Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pgpool-general] termination of maintenance for pgpool Hi pgpool users, I would like to propose to terminate of maintenance for pgpool(not pgpool-II). It seems there's no reason to continute to use pgpool, and actually there are very few people who are still using pgpool. And, of course, resource for developing is precious so I think it would be more productive to focus on pgpool-II developement. Comments? suggestions? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
