> > Question: Could it be that a failover was triggered for a different > > number of rows in a previous version? We were under the impression > that > > this was the behaviour. > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Ger. > > > > > Hi again, > > Could someone kindly give me an answer to the questions above? I do > think this is an important issue.
I have the same question. I thought that different number of rows was triggering a failover, but tests with pgpool-II 2.2.2 have not shown this behavior. However, I DO have seen this behavior before. Any other answering this question, please? Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
