-----Original Message----- From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wed 7/28/2010 7:08 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Sean Brown; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Order of Query Results > Le 28/07/2010 17:16, Sean Brown a écrit : > > On Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:56:27 am you wrote: > >> Le 28/07/2010 16:50, Sean Brown a écrit : > >>> Does PgPool have an issue with the order of results from a query being > >>> returned in a different order? > >>> > >>> With the ongoing issue of our cluster falling out, we just had one member > >>> fall out again and again, no error in PostgreSQLs log is recorded. > >>> PgPool reports the possible last query was: > >>> select * from carts where cart_id in (11835,11824,11819) > >>> > >>> Specifically the error in PgPools log is: > >>> read_kind_from_backend: 1 th kind D does not match with master or > >>> majority connection kind ^@ > >>> 2010-07-28 10:21:23 ERROR: pid 28242: kind mismatch among backends. > >>> Possible last query was: "select * from carts where cart_id in > >>> (11835,11824,11819)" kind details are: 1[D] > >>> > >>> If I run that query on the remaining node and on the one that just fell > >>> out, I get the same 3 results, but the orders of the records are > >>> different. > >> > >> The query you show doesn't ask for a specific order (no "ORDER BY" > >> clause), so each backend can send the data in whatever order they "prefer". > > > > That I understand, what I am wondering is if this will cause PgPool to > > believe > > there is an error in the information returned from the backends, even if > > the > > only difference is the difference in order? > > > > If it does, I assume the best way to deal with it is add order by's to > > every > > query passed to pgpool? > > > > That's actually really good questions, and I don't have an answer to > them. CC back the list to know if other people have an answer to give us.
No, pgpool does not care about the order of data returned by SELECT. More details... PostgreSQL returns data packet like this: T(descriptions about tuple) D(actual one raw tuple data) D D : : C(indicates succeeded in sending data) where each single capital letter is "packet kind"(see PostgreSQL docs for more details). What pgpool actually does is, checking the packet kind, not content of tuple data. So as long as same number of tuples are returned from each backend, pgpool is happy. I'm not sure what pgpool version Sean's uses, it seems it's a little bit old (from the error message I guess). Also, "majority connection kind ^@" looks strange. ^@ = 0x00, which is not valid kind at all. It seems something unusual is going on... If self cantained test case is provided, I will be able to look into this. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp Host is CentOS 5.5, PostgreSQL 8.4.4 and PgPool is 2.3.3 And just in case it matters, The ordering system we use that is the primary user of our database is using a very old Python (1.5) and the old pg connector. The test case is sort of an issue. We haven't been able to actually narrow down any one thing that causes our problems. Usually, there are no errors printed anywhere around the time where a node falls out. I had turned child_life_time from 120 to 0 wondering if PgPool was killing a child that had a persistent connection open (It seems FexEx shipping tool is kind of stupid in that way) and pgpool held it together for a few days longer then usual, but eventually it still fell apart. Maybe the next time it dies (probably tomorrow) I'll have more log information.
_______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
