> On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 08:13 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> > Thank you very much for the answer. >> > Is there a plan for using sr_check_password in the next release of pgpool >> > 3.1 series? >> >> Yes, it's in my plan. Unless supporting sr_check_password is too >> invasive... > > Sorry, but I disagree. Either it is a bug and it should get fixed, or it > isn't a bug, and this new feature should go into 3.2. Changing behaviour > between minor releases should not happen.
If sr_check_password is not in 3.1, you are argument is perfectly adequate. But in 3.1 sr_check_password is there but it's not used. Doesn't it a bug? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list Pgpool-general@pgfoundry.org http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
