Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009 à 14:44:15, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : > > > > I've been reading the patch which allow pgPool-II to handle calls to > > > > now() when pgPool-II is in replication mode. This is quite > > > > interesting. Nevertheless, I was wondering why random() did not get > > > > the same treament. Is there issues with it? > > > > > > There's no technical reason why we can't do this. If there's enough > > > demand, we will implement it. > > > > OK. I'm for it. But I suppose one is not enough :) > > Just out of curiousity, what are the use cases for random()? Maybe for > generating test data?
Good question. I should better ask my customers. But you're right, I don't see much value to add this. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
