> Le 03/08/2010 13:29, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : > > Le 03/08/2010 12:23, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : > >>> Le 03/08/2010 03:48, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : > >>>>>>> AFAICT, it works really good. We still miss pgsql_pid. And should I > >>>>>>> add > >>>>>>> some other reports? what do other people need? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No comments on this patch? meaning I should commit it or not? > >>>>> > >>>>> I was waiting for you add pgsql_pid. Have you done it? > >>>> > >>>> I have added new function: > >>>> /* > >>>> * Return pointer to i th child, j th connection pool and k th backend > >>>> * of connection info on shmem. > >>>> */ > >>>> ConnectionInfo *pool_coninfo(int child, int connection_pool, int backend) > >>>> > >>>> I hope this will make your implementation regarding pgsql_pid easier. > >>>> For example, pool_coninfo(10, 0, 1) will return pointer to > >>>> ConnectionInfo corresponds to 1th backend pid which is in 0th > >>>> connection pool in 10th pgpool child. > >>> > >>> Sorry for not answering sooner. I thought you were working on adding > >>> pgsql_pid. There was a little misunderstanding :) > >> > >> Oh, I thought I woould work on pcp command, you would work on show > >> command. > >> > > > > No problem :) > > > > I'll work on it ASAP. > > > > With your last commits, it makes it quite easy to do. Here is my new > patch. I still have an issue and perhaps you have an idea on how to > resolve it. Is there a way to know which connection is the active one in > a pool?
This patch looks good and works good for me. Please commit. Would you please update doc/pgpool-en.html as well to add those new show commands? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list Pgpool-hackers@pgfoundry.org http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
