Le 05/01/2011 11:25, Gilles Darold a écrit : > Le 05/01/2011 09:04, Guillaume Lelarge a écrit : >> Le 05/01/2011 02:46, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : >>>> Le 30/12/2010 23:52, Gilles Darold a écrit : >>>>> Sorry again I've sent the wrong patch, here is the one using >>>>> REAL_PRIMARY_NODE_ID. >>>>> Please apologies for so much post. >>>>> >>>> It compiles and runs. No bug found. >>> I wonder what is shown in the field when operated in other than >>> master/slave & streaming replication mode. >> It says that all nodes are primary or all nodes are standby, which >> obvisouly is wrong. The patch needs to check we are in master/slave mode >> and in replication mode. Otherwise, it should say N/A. Gilles, ca, you >> do this little change, please? >> > > Well in any case it display the master slave state, that mean that if we > are not in master slave node 0 is always P and others are S. Will fix > that as you want, here what I propose : > > - In replication mode state is "R" for every node. > - In master/slave mode we still have both "P" for the primary and "S" > for secondaries. > - In non master/slave mode nor replication mode all node states are set > to "-" > > I will used "IS_MASTER_NODE_ID(i)" instead of "PRIMARY_NODE_ID == i" to > test the primary node. > > Is that ok for you ? >
Yeah, that's fine. -- Guillaume http://www.postgresql.fr http://dalibo.com _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
