On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]> wrote: > > On master we do: > > BEGIN; > SELECT 1 FROM t1_i_seq FOR UPDATE;
and why you are allowed to execute FOR UPDATE in a sequence? i mean, if you can't lock the secuence it has no sense that you can lock the rows on it... is it not a postgres bug that we should report instead of exploit it? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
