-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/03/2011 01:39, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> Le 22/02/2011 01:33, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : >>> Hi pgpool-II hackers, >>> >>> As discussed in Paris, here is the pgpool-II 3.1 release schedule: >>> >>> Between March 1 and 8: pgpool-II 3.1.0 beta1 release. >>> April 2: pgpool-II 3.1 official release >>> >>> Also I would like to release pgpoolAdmin 3.1 on the same day as >>> pgpool-II. >>> >>> Here are TODOs for pgpool-II 3.1: >>> >>> 1) Application name fix(Tatsuo) >> >> This is done. >> >>> 2) PCP commands as PostgreSQL functions(Toshihiro) >> >> AFAIK, this isn't. > > Toshiro gave it to Jehan-Guillaume on March 1. Unless he's working on > this and closing to release the first cut, let's postpone it to 3.2.
Yes, sorry I couldn't work on it so far, I planned some time this week to work on that. > >>> 3) Internationalization of pcp command message(Guillaume Lelarge) >> >> This isn't and I won't have the time to do it now. > > Ok, let's drop it then. > >>> 4) French translation of doc/ (Guillaume Lelarge) >> >> This is more Jean-Paul's item. AFAIK, there are no progress on this. >> >>> 5) German translation of doc/ (Makus Wanner) >>> >> >> AFAIK, this isn't done. > > I will ping Markus and get back with the result. > >>> Here are TODOs for pgpoolAdmin 3.1: >>> 1) Add configuration directives that are new in pgpool-II 3.1(?) > > Jehan-Guillaume kindly offered to work on this part on February 23. Same, I gonna start on this this week > >>> - Write a document how to add configuration directives (Toshihiro) > > Toshihiro has finished the documentation on March 3. > >>> 2) French message update (Guillaume Lelarge) >> >> I checked, and there's nothing to update. > >>> 3) German message addition ((Makus Wanner) >> >> So, what do we do? do we push back the release? or do we get the beta >> out in a few days? > > I think the pgpoolAdmin thing and message/documentation part could be > delayed after beta. I tend to agree that we get the beta out in a few > days. > > What about outstanding patches, namely: > > - pcp_promoto_node patch > - follow master patch > > What do you think? Sould we include in 3.1 or postpone them for 3.2? > -- > Tatsuo Ishii > SRA OSS, Inc. Japan > English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php > Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp > _______________________________________________ > Pgpool-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers - -- Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais DBA http://www.dalibo.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk19VtMACgkQXu9L1HbaT6LPpgCfQ6G+HmVF1ysLdyKThdk4B5DX VTkAoKtS+fznNdmlEhMzSs9mRzv+QooL =yZsZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
