>> Problem with the way you suggested is: >> >> 1) We may have even 10 or more parameters. I don't want to make >> pgpool.conf that big for just one functionality. >> >> 2) Adding parameters will require major version up of pgpool-II. > > In such case, adding one or ten is irrelevant, you still have to bump > the major version up. > >> 3) Adding parameters will require pgpool related applications such as >> pgpoolAdmin major version up. > > Same argument here.
No. As long as the tools treat the memory cache parameter as just a string, they don't need to be changed. >> So I think "one parameter way" seems to be better in this case. IMO on >> memory query cache staff is woth to be treated differently from other >> config directives. > > > -- > Guillaume > http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info > http://www.dalibo.com > _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
