> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Guillaume Lelarge > <guilla...@lelarge.info>wrote: > >> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:47 -0400, Gurjeet Singh wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> > <guilla...@lelarge.info>wrote: >> > >> > > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:07 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >> > > > > All good news :) Is that conversion script and related >> conversations >> > > > > available on some mailing list. >> > > > >> > > > Guillaume Lelarge, >> > > > Are you ok with this? >> > > > >> > > >> > > Sure. >> > > >> > > All the discussions (apart from a live one in Dalibo's office) were >> > > public. The main thread is "Exodus from pgfoundry" on pgpool-hackers >> > > (http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2011-June/000768.html). >> > > On the git conversion, the more interesting one is this one: >> > > http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2011-June/000780.html >> > > >> > >> > Thanks for the pointers :) >> > >> > Do you have any timelines on this effort? Just trying to avoid >> duplicating >> > the work that community might already be about to finish. >> > >> >> Nope. We first need the repository on git.postgresql.org. Tatsuo >> probably already has it. > > > I don't see it on git.pg.org. If Tatsuo has already submitted a request for > a repository, it might take time since I *think* the approval process over > there is manual and may take anywhere from days to weeks, unless you nudge > someone on the IRC/pgsql-hackers list.
Yes, I have submitted the request several days ago and still waiting for reply. Maybe I should post to pgsql-hackers to push the approval process? > >> Then, I guess we just need the time to do it, >> even if it shouldn't be long. >> > > On the recent pgpool-committers list [2] I see that it is Kitagawa and > T-ishii who are most active, and sometimes Bambo too, so probably we need to > coordinate with just the two of them for the Git migration as they would be > the most affected by it in short-term. > > >> >> > I see that those conversations are now 4 months old, and one of the 2 >> > concerns raised (multi-byte chracters) has been addressed. Any other >> pending >> > concerns that we are waiting for? >> > >> >> Not that I know. You were talking about two concerns, the multibyte one >> and another one. Which is the other one? I think the multibyte concern was already solved by Toshiiro. > I was talking about the 2 'TODO' items you mentioned at the end of your > email [2]; the other concern being the name/email pairs in default.options > being outdated. > > Regards, > > [1] http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-committers/ > [2] http://pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pgpool-hackers/2011-June/000780.html -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list Pgpool-hackers@pgfoundry.org http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
