On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:30 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > BTW, something that first surprises me is that cvs2git doesn't convert > > each cvs branch in a git branch. It does that because the cvs branch was > > not used, hence it is not needed. We could create the branch afterwards > > if we need it. > > Question is, actually there are branches in the cvs repository. > > [t-ishii@localhost pgpool-II]$ cvs status README > =================================================================== > File: README Status: Up-to-date > > Working revision: 1.2 > Repository revision: 1.2 /cvsroot/pgpool/pgpool-II/README,v > Sticky Tag: V3_1_STABLE (branch: 1.2.14) > Sticky Date: (none) > Sticky Options: (none) > > Why do you think that branch was not used? >
It didn't speak about that branch (obviously because it didn't exist at the time). > Anyway, if cvs2git does not convert each branch in a git branch, thing > goes worst. Because any changes which are newer than HEAD made to a > branch are lost in the converted git repository. It does the work all right. -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
