"That way" ?
Is there another way you think about ?
I think the solution proposed by Jorge Garcia could work : CODA as a distributed file
system, in order to be able to retreive the database installation in case of crash of
one machine, and an idle postgres that can quickly serve this installation (with a few
minutes gap). Is there something else to do
Nicolas Huillard
-----Message d'origine-----
De: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: mardi 14 mars 2000 17:03
�: Nicolas Huillard
Cc: Ricardo Kleemann; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: Re: [ADMIN] pgsql and nfs
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> This question leads me to another one : can we do High Availability using Postgres.
> If one Postgres machine fails, is there a means to have another Postgres
>installation share the same databases, with the lastest data in them ?
> Is it a Postgres issue, or an hardware/system issue ?
I see your goal now. No, you can't do high availability that way. You
are still stuck if the postgres machine fails.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
