On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > "Schmidt, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However, what I'm interested in is the comparison between 7.0x and 7.1x. > > Shouldn't the 7.1b4 database be faster? Have you (or anyone else) done this > > comparison? > > 7.1 is considerably faster if you compare performance without -F. > If you are comparing performance with -F, I'm not sure exactly how it > stacks up. > If I good remember, a compare is in some old Vadim's mail, -F is still faster. Karel
- [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Schmidt, Peter
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Michael Ansley
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Schmidt, Peter
- Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tom Lane
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Karel Zak
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Michael Ansley
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Schmidt, Peter
- Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Bruce Momjian
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Schmidt, Peter
- Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Bruce Momjian
- Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tom Lane
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Schmidt, Peter
- Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tom Lane
- RE: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Schmidt, Peter
- Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance Tom Lane