On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > In its present form it's far too bulky to be kept around over any long > period of time --- or didn't you notice all the squawks about WAL files > overrunning disk as soon as anyone had a long-running transaction?
hm.. How does this compare with the Oracle system? Are the Oracle logs smaller? This is how we perform most of our mirroring with Oracle, and yes, it does produce rather large files, but once the most recent file has been transferred over and uploaded into the mirror database, they get deleted. Admittedly this involves lots of cron writing, but it works.. :-) -- Giles Constant, Systems Programmer Hyperlink Interactive http://www.hyperlink-interactive.co.uk ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
