Allan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If my (RH 7.1) system crashes PostgreSQL does not restart automatically 
> because the shared memory segment identifier and the .pid file remains, 

That's kinda hard to believe; how would a shared memory segment survive
a system crash?

>   % pg_ctl start
>   pg_ctl: Another postmaster may be running.  Trying to start postmaster 
> anyway.
>   Found a pre-existing shared memory block (ID 693600256) still in use.

Darn, I thought we had fixed that class of problems.  Would you try
tracing through SharedMemoryIsInUse() to figure out why it thinks that?
It could be that there's some platform-specific variation of shmctl()
behavior that we need to cater for.

> What is the "proper" way of ensuring (as far as possible) that 
> PostgreSQL starts automatically after a crash?  Is it sufficient (and 
> safe) to include a 'rm -f $PGDATA/postmaster.pid' in the system boot 
> scripts?

You can do that if you want, but MHO is that this is a bug we need to
fix.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to