Allan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If my (RH 7.1) system crashes PostgreSQL does not restart automatically > because the shared memory segment identifier and the .pid file remains,
That's kinda hard to believe; how would a shared memory segment survive a system crash? > % pg_ctl start > pg_ctl: Another postmaster may be running. Trying to start postmaster > anyway. > Found a pre-existing shared memory block (ID 693600256) still in use. Darn, I thought we had fixed that class of problems. Would you try tracing through SharedMemoryIsInUse() to figure out why it thinks that? It could be that there's some platform-specific variation of shmctl() behavior that we need to cater for. > What is the "proper" way of ensuring (as far as possible) that > PostgreSQL starts automatically after a crash? Is it sufficient (and > safe) to include a 'rm -f $PGDATA/postmaster.pid' in the system boot > scripts? You can do that if you want, but MHO is that this is a bug we need to fix. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]