Manuel Trujillo wrote: > El jue, 24-01-2002 a las 09:27, Luis Amigo escribió: > > On my own experience I will tell you that if you're able to force postgres > > to keep all database in memory it will be very fast, so memory only depends > > on your > > database size. > > Each backend may run on a different processor, so the more processors u > > have the more backends u can run at once > > hope it helps > > Yes, but... How can I know the exact size of my database? And, if I > compile the postgresql under four processors, don't work like (or in a) > SMP, distributing the charge into the four processors?? > > -- > Manuel Trujillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Technical Engineer http://www.motograndprix.com > Dorna Sports S.L. +34 93 4702864
Si prefieres hablamos en español. we're currently working on a 8-processor sgi server with irix by now each backend run in one processor there is no load balance the amount of memory u will need is as I know (table size+indexes size) they are in your base directory, if u can afford it then u will be working on memory but fsync and walfiles hope it help
begin:vcard n:Amigo Navarro;Luis Alberto tel;cell:609581857 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Universidad de Cantabria;Arquitectura de Computadores adr:;;Avda Los Castros S/N ;Santander;Cantabria;39005;España version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x-mozilla-cpt:;0 fn:Luis Amigo end:vcard
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
