Andy Marden wrote: > I'm just coming at this from the point of view of someone who's > implementing PostgreSQL for the first time, but has in-depth > Oracle experience. This is the one area left where organisations > are going to discount PostgreSQL because they can't afford to > tell people that all data entered that day has to be re-entered > (sorry) because of a database corruption. How slick it is > doesn't matter initially, as long as it can reliably be done.
I totally agree. That's why it is under URGENT on the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
