I am having an optimization problem with queries that include IN clauses
and subselects.
xxx=> select version();
version
-------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.2.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
The basic query I have is:
UPDATE my_table
SET some_col=some_value
WHERE my_table.foreign_key_with_an_index IN (
SELECT primary_key
FROM my_other_table
WHERE my_other_table.some_indexed_column = some_other_value);
The problem is that even though <my_table> has an index on
<my_table.foreign_key_with_an_index>, an EXPLAIN reports and performance
supports the fact that the server performs a sequential scan on my_table
instead of an indexed scan on the column. This is in contrast to the
query:
UPDATE my_table
SET some_col=some_value
WHERE my_table.foreign_key_with_an_index IN (val1,val2,val3...)
which will show an indexed scan and accordingly good performance.
Having done digging within the online user docs, including
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.22, I'm not sure
whether this is an issue of Postgres always wanting to seq_scan when faced
with IN clauses and subselects or if I have a stats problem where the
optimizer thinks my subselect will return hundreds of rows (even though I
know it's never more than 4) and thus opts for a single seq rather than
100s of random page accesses to go from index to base table.
If it is the former, then I've got an issue with the optimizers
capabilibilities and will be looking for info that something within a later
release will makes things better.
If it is the latter, I need to continue my learning journey into the
optimizer, Analyze and statistics.
Can someone shed light as to which path I should be following?
Marc Mitchell - Senior Application Architect
Enterprise Information Solutions, Inc.
Downers Grove, IL 60515
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
