On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:06:41 -0700, Josh Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What could cause a table to act serialized when read committed transactions > are set in the configuration? That is something I am running into, which > provoked my [incorrect] example.
Getting lucky. Did you actually run two transactions in parallel and stop between the select and insert so that you could do a select, insert and commit in the other transaction? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
